The Canadian Library Association released its list of most frequently challenged books last week, in advance of Banned Books Week in the US. Included in the list are other forms of media – DVDs and CDs — which were challenged by public library patrons across Canada in 2009 as being unsuitable for distribution.
Reading the list, I have to ask:
Are you kidding me?
It almost goes without saying (but I’ll say it anyway) that I find the idea of “banning” books abhorrent, especially from public libraries, which should encourage the free flow of ideas and information. This will necessarily mean that there will be books available in the library which I may not wish to read, because I find the subject matter disturbing, distasteful, or just plain boring. There may be books which I may feel my children should not read – yet — or should read with me, so that I can provide them with context or information to help them understand what they’re reading. That’s a parent’s job. But I don’t presume that I have the right to dictate what someone else should be reading, and the idea that I could march into my local public library and demand that they remove a book (or movie, or CD) from the shelf is a concept I find quite unpalatable and problematic.
Which is why I find the Canadian Library Association’s list is so fascinating. Who are these people who have such trouble with Dora and Diego teaching Spanish? Was it the line, “Dum ditty, Dum ditty, Dum dum dum” that caused someone to cast aspersions on Hand Hand Fingers Thumb? Whose favourite movie was so poorly reviewed in Leonard Maltin’s Movie Guide 2010 Edition that they’d go so far as to demand that the book be removed from circulation?
To be clear, there are books on that list on subjects I find to be in poor taste, but I acknowledge that taste is subjective. You may think Tila Tequila is fascinating. I’d rather undergo root canal than read about her, but I’m not going to tell you how to waste your own time.
But there’s one DVD on the list whose inclusion made me just plain grumpy.
Father Christmas by Raymond Briggs. Bloomin’ ‘eck, my sister and I loved this book when we were kids. This Father Christmas is no milquetoast, benevolent patriarch. No, he is a bit of a curmudgeon, with a fondness for a good pud’, a good brandy, and a warm fire after a long night of delivering presents. He’s familiar, approachable in his ordinariness – do you know how to get presents into a mobile home? – and even a bit human, which is a wonderful thing for an essentially magical figure to be.
The movie takes one step further toward irreverence. Having had enough with the “bloomin’ snow” and “bloomin’ deer”, Father Christmas (voiced by Mel Smith) retreats to France, Scotland and Las Vegas on holiday. He eats and drinks far too much. He gambles. He wishes for a “proper bloomin’ lavatory” (and is in frequent need of one). He’s desperate to leave his Father Christmas persona behind, but fails spectacularly as folk recognize him wherever he goes, no matter how hard he tries to dress like a “local”. The movie is much less charming than the book, but it is still amusing, and as I understand it, a holiday classic in the UK.
It’s not a movie for the smallest children, the ones who still believe in Santa, although much of the humour would be lost on them anyway. But certainly, any child whose belief in Santa has ebbed would be able to handle its bawdy, but not outrageous, humour. So why was it challenged? I can only assume it’s because people believe there’s no need for any vision of Santa that strays from the Clement C. Moore version. And that’s why this challenge makes me grumpy, because clearly, there’s an adult out there who thinks that Santa Claus (the fictional character, not St. Nicholas) is real. That any portrayal of him as other than the kindly, jolly old elf is an offence. Perhaps they’re worried they’ll make Santa’s naughty list. Either that, or some parent didn’t bother to read the DVD case before plopping their pre-schooler down in front of the TV, and now they’re looking for someone to blame now that their child no longer believes. In either instance, I do hope which ever library handled this challenge sent this patron on their way with a box of Quality Street, a nip of brandy, and a wish that they have a Happy Christmas. Even this version of Father Christmas would approve of that.
Great to have the Canadian content! Thanks for linking to the CLA.
I found this alarming:
Total challenges in 2009 represented a significant increase over previous years because several large series of novels were reported that year. For the same reason, challenges to books were substantially higher in 2009 than before, while those to DVDs and videos were lower and those to sound recordings were about the same. The proportion of challenges reported in public libraries in 2009 was the lowest of the four years, appearing to mark a trend downwards. Challenges reported by school libraries in 2009 were the highest of the four years, and of particular note was the new phenomenon of teaching assistants, who initiated one-third of all 2009 challenges. Patron challenges were lower than in 2008, but about the same as for 2007. Parents and guardians initiated challenges in the same proportion as in 2008, while library staff members were responsible for more challenges in 2009 than in 2008.”
Odd that it is schools and teaching assistants who are behind such a large increase, but comforting to see that there appears to be a downward trend in challenges at public libraries.
We are going to check out King and King today.
I actually find the statistics reassuring. I take Nathalie’s point that the stats are rising, but still 139 challenges isn’t bad (especially if a person is allowed to make more than one challenge) when you think of millions of library users…